Minneapolis-St. Paul Int. Airport

Minneapolis, USA Transportation

← Back to Case Studies

A Façade That Adapts to the Sun

A 940-foot, southeast-facing airport terminal cannot rely on one kind of glass. The façade had to keep the views passengers expect, control the low morning sun they do not, and deliver comfortable daylight from sunrise to dusk.

Project Details

Architect & Planner Alliiance
Project Team Greg Maxam, Director of Sustainable Design; Ashley Ilvonen, Lead Designer
Client Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport
Location Minneapolis–Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
Building Type Airport terminal — Terminal 1-Lindbergh expansion
Façade Orientation Southeast-facing; approximately 940 feet long
Daylighting Strategy Hybrid façade: Solera® translucent glazing + electrochromic vision glass
Product Application Solera® in upper façade; electrochromic vision glass below
Construction Requirement Airport remained operational throughout the multi-year expansion
Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport Terminal 1
940 feet
Southeast-Facing Terminal Façade Designed to Manage Direct Sunrise Sun

When Alliiance re-imagined the airport experience for employees and travelers, natural light and a visual connection to the outdoors were central to the vision. But the project team also knew that a long, southeast-facing terminal receives significant direct sun — including deep penetration at sunrise — in a public space designed to serve millions of passengers.

Glare-free daylight isn’t a feature, it’s a performance standard. For this terminal, visual and thermal discomfort were not acceptable outcomes. Yet neither was a darkened departures hall with the blinds closed. The design needed a façade that could change the passenger experience without sacrificing daylight, views, or long-term durability.

What the Terminal Had to Solve

A long southeast exposure.
The 940-foot façade receives strong, low-angle morning sun and radically different solar conditions as the day progresses.
Views and daylight were both essential.
Vision glass alone would preserve the exterior connection but create glare and heat gain; translucent glazing alone would provide daylight but eliminate needed views.
A public building requires lasting performance.
Airport components have to withstand intensive daily use, long service life, and construction work without shutting the terminal down.

“The terminal is 940 feet long and faces southeast, so it gets a lot of direct sunlight, including deep penetration at sunrise. We had a vision to create a unified façade that adapts to solar conditions — whether it be the harsh morning sun or dimming light at dusk.”
— Greg Maxam, Director of Sustainable Design, Alliiance

The Better Option: A Hybrid Façade

Instead of asking one product to do every job, Alliiance designed a hybrid façade. A solar-penetration study determined where each glazing type belonged. Electrochromic vision glass was used in the lower section to retain views and manage glare and solar heat gain through electronic tinting. Solera® was placed in the upper section to deliver diffuse daylight even when the vision glass was at its darkest.

Two Materials. Two Clear Jobs.

Electrochromic glass below: views, dynamic solar control, and glare management. Solera® above: broad, evenly diffused daylight and a more thermally effective upper façade. Together, the materials create a unified architectural expression that adapts to conditions throughout the day without relying on blinds or added window coverings.

“We chose Solera® for the upper section of the façade because we like how it scatters light, while improving the U-value of the overall façade. Solera® offered custom sizing, the translucent panels control glare, and the white colouring helps achieve an airiness in the building.”
— Ashley Ilvonen, Lead Designer, Alliiance

Minneapolis–Saint Paul Airport terminal interior with hybrid Solera® and electrochromic façade Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport with Solera® glazing

Hybrid façade in action: Solera® in the upper section provides diffuse daylight while electrochromic vision glass below maintains views and controls solar exposure.

Why the Combination Works at Airport Scale

The value of the hybrid approach is that it preserves the benefits of each material without accepting the conventional trade-offs. The lower vision-glass zone gives passengers their connection to the outdoors. The Solera® zone keeps useful daylight present when the vision glass is tinted. The building is more visually consistent, more comfortable to occupy, and better equipped to respond to changing solar conditions.

Views
Electrochromic glass retains the visual connection to the outdoors
Daylight
Solera® keeps diffuse daylight present as vision glass tints
Performance
Glare control and thermal performance are built into the strategy
“Airports are public buildings with long life spans…higher quality products are needed, higher durability and product performance. All of this leads you to Solera® — a more integrated daylighting solution for more design freedom.”
— Ashley Ilvonen, Lead Designer, Alliiance

The Takeaway: Use the Right Material in the Right Place

The Terminal 1 expansion demonstrates the advantage of treating daylighting as a façade strategy, not a window selection. Begin with views. Put vision glass where people benefit from looking out. Add Solera® where the goal is controlled, glare-free daylight. Use opaque enclosure where neither daylight nor views are required.

For complex public spaces, modelling makes that strategy practical. It helps designers see how solar exposure changes across the façade, determine how much controlled daylight is needed, and prove that the resulting space will work before the project is built.

Architect & Planner: Alliiance   |   Client: Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport   |   Product: Solera® + electrochromic glass   |   Photography: © Metropolitan Airports Commission